文章导航
IdcBuster是在美华人运营VPS主机商，采用Xen和OpenVZ架构，数据中心在洛杉矶PR（速度优秀），五月码：may66全场66折，购买x512方案 ￥39元/月（购买链接）配置如下：
- 8 CPU Cores, 512MB RAM
- 20GB Raid10 DiskSpace
- 500GB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
- Xen/SolusVM
IdcBuster成立于2007年，前身为TongSite.COM(目前仍在运营中)，属于老牌主机商，今年与HardBirch合并后，主推廉价虚拟主机空间和无管理型VPS，提供基于OpenVZ、Xen、KVM技术的美国VPS主机，亦选用了洛杉矶PR机房作为主数据中心。即使为廉价VPS，其所有服务器依然均为服务器级CPU、RAID10阵列和G级端口。
洛杉矶PR 测试IP：173.254.246.105 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 512 17 494 0 0 8
-/+ buffers/cache: 9 502
Swap: 0 0 0
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# df -hal
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 20G 441M 20G 3% /
proc 0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys
none 0 0 0 - /dev/pts
none 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc[root@vpsmm-test ~]# cat /proc/couinfo cat: /proc/couinfo: No such file or directory [root@vpsmm-test ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 30 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz stepping : 5 cpu MHz : 359.765 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov ... bogomips : 5333.04 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 30 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz stepping : 5 cpu MHz : 359.765 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov ... bogomips : 5333.04 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.81562 seconds, 70.4 MB/s [root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.45889 seconds, 77.6 MB/s [root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.62985 seconds, 74.0 MB/s
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --08:47:02-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[============================================>] 104,857,600 12.9M/s in 7.8s 08:47:10 (12.7 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: vpsmm-test: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab062.2 -- #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 18:28:35 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz (5333.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz (5333.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
08:50:28 up 1:51, 1 user, load average: 0.48, 0.17, 0.05; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 05 2012 08:50:28 - 09:19:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 6428353.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2373.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1952.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 368721.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 102421.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 770854.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 785015.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 66444.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5815.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2304.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 260.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 898960.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6428353.0 550.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2373.5 431.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 1952.2 454.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 368721.9 931.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 102421.6 618.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 770854.7 1329.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 785015.4 631.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 66444.8 166.1
Process Creation 126.0 5815.6 461.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2304.7 543.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 260.9 434.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 898960.3 599.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 536.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 05 2012 09:19:38 - 09:51:57
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 5208753.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4456.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2082.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 218369.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62332.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 555236.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 600195.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 75842.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5264.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2048.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 252.8 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 732611.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 5208753.2 446.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4456.6 810.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2082.1 484.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 218369.9 551.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62332.0 376.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 555236.3 957.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 600195.2 482.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 75842.9 189.6
Process Creation 126.0 5264.8 417.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2048.4 483.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 252.8 421.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 732611.9 488.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 475.1洛杉矶PR 测试IP：173.254.246.105 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 香港[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 166毫秒
- 54
- 2
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 166毫秒
- 49
- 3
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 153毫秒
- 50
- 4
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 194毫秒
- 51
- 5
- 深圳[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 169毫秒
- 49
- 6
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 157毫秒
- 53
- 7
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 194毫秒
- 50
- 8
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 167毫秒
- 51
- 9
- 上海[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 144毫秒
- 51
- 10
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 231毫秒
- 51
- 11
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 229毫秒
- 53
- 12
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 173.254.246.105
- 140毫秒
- 49
- 13
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 173.254.246.105
- 234毫秒
- 52
- 14
- 上海[多线]
- 173.254.246.105
- 171毫秒
- 47
- 15
- 宁波[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 216毫秒
- 49
- 16
- 河南[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 287毫秒
- 53
- 17
- 辽宁[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 242毫秒
- 54
- 18
- 深圳[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 259毫秒
- 52
- 19
- 北京[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 192毫秒
- 46
- 20
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 223毫秒
- 52
- 21
- 广东[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 234毫秒
- 52
- 22
- 上海[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 237毫秒
- 53
- 23
- 天津[联通]
- 173.254.246.105
- 201毫秒
- 46
- 24
- 上海[移动]
- 173.254.246.105
- 193毫秒
- 52
- 25
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 173.254.246.105
- 198毫秒
- 49
- 26
- 深圳[移动]
- 173.254.246.105
- 179毫秒
- 49
- 27
- 河北[移动]
- 173.254.246.105
- 230毫秒
- 48
最快：江苏无锡[电信] 140 毫秒 ### 最慢：河南[联通] 287 毫秒
电信平均：175 毫秒 ### 联通平均：232 毫秒
电信平均：175 毫秒 ### 联通平均：232 毫秒
