文章导航
快易互联是中国优秀VPS主机商，采用XenServer架构，系统支持L/W全系列，新增DC圣安娜KT（速度优秀），无码直接优惠，购买x512方案 ￥99元/月（购买链接）配置如下：
- 1 CPU Core, 512MB RAM
- 20GB R10 Diskspace
- 500GB Bandwidth @ 100Mbps
- XenServer/IdcSystem
KT比较少VPS商家，这是个非常优秀的线路。川哥此次为新蛋自行购置全新服务器，拖管于KT机房，整机性能十分出色。不得多得，预购从速。此优惠，不享受小夜博客翻倍优惠。
kiiyi.com 圣安娜KT 测试IP：174.139.14.1
[root@MyVPS ~]# sh bench.sh CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3300.028 MHz Total amount of ram : 512 MB Total amount of swap : 255 MB System uptime : 1:18, Download speed from CacheFly: 9.51MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 6.05MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 6.53MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.63MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 2.69MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 3.77MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.68MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 9.43MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.9MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 4.63MB/s I/O speed : 236 MB/s
[root@MyVPS ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 512 172 339 0 10 119
-/+ buffers/cache: 41 470
Swap: 255 0 255
[root@MyVPS ~]# df -ha;
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
9.3G 1.2G 7.7G 13% /
proc 0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys
devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts
/dev/xvda1 99M 29M 66M 31% /boot
tmpfs 257M 0 257M 0% /dev/shm
none 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
sunrpc 0 0 0 - /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs[root@MyVPS ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3300.028 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8252.61 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3300.028 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8252.61
[root@MyVPS ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.6458 seconds, 73.6 MB/s [root@MyVPS ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.92797 seconds, 68.3 MB/s [root@MyVPS ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.8652 seconds, 69.4 MB/s
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 05 2013 20:24:07 - 20:52:19
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18469443.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2896.4 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3076.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 598773.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 158437.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1781997.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 860281.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 136961.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5805.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5672.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1195.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 603907.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18469443.3 1582.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2896.4 526.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3076.8 715.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 598773.3 1512.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 158437.8 957.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1781997.1 3072.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 860281.8 691.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 136961.9 342.4
Process Creation 126.0 5805.4 460.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5672.1 1337.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1195.4 1992.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 603907.1 402.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 907.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 05 2013 20:52:19 - 21:20:30
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 36968998.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5763.4 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5815.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 330172.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 125050.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1389886.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1719312.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 272058.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11050.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8937.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1336.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1168183.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 36968998.4 3167.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5763.4 1047.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 5815.6 1352.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 330172.2 833.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 125050.4 755.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1389886.8 2396.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1719312.9 1382.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 272058.5 680.1
Process Creation 126.0 11050.1 877.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8937.1 2107.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1336.2 2226.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1168183.7 778.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1285.8kiiyi.com 圣安娜KT 测试IP：174.139.14.1
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 1.58.106.1 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 8 | 36 | 96 | 26 | | 1.58.106.1 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 14 | 42 | 94 | 22 | | 1.62.143.253 - 12 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 34 | 9 | | 221.212.8.185 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 16 | 26 | 42 | 18 | | 113.4.128.141 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 56 | 66 | 51 | | 219.158.12.89 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 47 | 54 | 68 | 56 | | 219.158.100.166 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 78 | 85 | 101 | 82 | | 219.158.3.250 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 86 | 95 | 117 | 88 | | 219.158.96.254 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 81 | 89 | 101 | 81 | | 219.158.27.146 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 242 | 254 | 277 | 255 | | 207.254.191.45 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 235 | 251 | 264 | 258 | | VPLS-GW.BR1.LAX9.VPLS.NET - 0 | 29 | 29 | 236 | 249 | 268 | 249 | | VLAN78-VDX1.BR1.LAX1.VPLS.NET - 0 | 29 | 29 | 274 | 284 | 306 | 282 | | 174.139.14.1 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 249 | 267 | 286 | 268 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - 来自全中国最杯具线路黑龙江联通的路由追踪结果
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 209毫秒
- 50
- 2
- 深圳[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 162毫秒
- 49
- 3
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 168毫秒
- 50
- 4
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 206毫秒
- 49
- 5
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 145毫秒
- 49
- 6
- 重庆[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 197毫秒
- 53
- 7
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 166毫秒
- 50
- 8
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 189毫秒
- 51
- 9
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 272毫秒
- 51
- 10
- 江西[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 161毫秒
- 50
- 11
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 164毫秒
- 49
- 12
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 219毫秒
- 51
- 13
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 169毫秒
- 48
- 14
- 上海[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 192毫秒
- 52
- 15
- 香港[电信]
- 174.139.14.1
- 167毫秒
- 54
- 16
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 174.139.14.1
- 184毫秒
- 52
- 17
- 上海[多线]
- 174.139.14.1
- 206毫秒
- 48
- 18
- 上海[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 202毫秒
- 52
- 19
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 162毫秒
- 50
- 20
- 江苏[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 200毫秒
- 54
- 21
- 北京[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 216毫秒
- 46
- 22
- 厦门[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 188毫秒
- 54
- 23
- 宁波[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 229毫秒
- 47
- 24
- 辽宁[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 220毫秒
- 54
- 25
- 河南[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 202毫秒
- 53
- 26
- 深圳[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 163毫秒
- 52
- 27
- 天津[联通]
- 174.139.14.1
- 209毫秒
- 48
- 28
- 河北[移动]
- 174.139.14.1
- 237毫秒
- 52
- 29
- 深圳[移动]
- 174.139.14.1
- 227毫秒
- 52
- 30
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 174.139.14.1
- 236毫秒
- 52
- 31
- 上海[移动]
- 174.139.14.1
- 215毫秒
- 55
- 32
- 江苏[移动]
- 174.139.14.1
- 218毫秒
- 51
最快：江苏镇江[电信] 145 毫秒 ### 最慢：四川绵阳[电信] 272 毫秒
电信平均：185 毫秒 ### 联通平均：199 毫秒
电信平均：185 毫秒 ### 联通平均：199 毫秒
