文章导航
网人互联是中国VPS主机商,采用Xen架构,分Linux和win二个系列,数据中心在洛杉矶PR(亚洲优化线路,速度优秀),购买l256方案 ¥58元/月(购买链接)配置如下:
- 1 CPU Core, 256MB & 256MB swap
- 15GB R10+bbu Diskspace
- 300GB Bandwidth @ 100Mbps
- Xen/SolusVM
china800除VPS业务外,还提供包括linux空间/windows空间,仿牌主机,服务器租用,域名注册等业务。VPS属无管理型,环境安装等服务,需要另行支付费用。
china800.net 洛杉矶PR 测试IP:192.161.59.33 / 100mb / php探针 / wp演示
[root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3300.066 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt bogomips : 8293.69 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3300.066 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up ida arat pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt bogomips : 8293.69
[root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 512 494 17 0 18 407 -/+ buffers/cache: 68 443 Swap: 511 0 511 [root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# df -hal Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 30G 2.0G 27G 8% / proc 0 0 0 - /proc devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts none 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
[root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.56727 seconds, 58.8 MB/s [root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.64925 seconds, 57.7 MB/s [root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.63983 seconds, 47.6 MB/s
[root@vpsmm vpsr.com.cn]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2013-03-20 20:40:49-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[=================================================>] 104,857,600 6.41M/s in 14s 2013-03-20 20:41:04 (7.05 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 20 2013 20:41:41 - 21:09:52 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17888160.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2881.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2727.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 529022.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 142555.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1510518.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 848040.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 122123.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5346.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5260.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1101.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 667788.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17888160.2 1532.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2881.7 523.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2727.9 634.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 529022.5 1335.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 142555.9 861.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1510518.1 2604.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 848040.6 681.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 122123.7 305.3 Process Creation 126.0 5346.4 424.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5260.9 1240.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1101.2 1835.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 667788.9 445.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 847.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 20 2013 21:09:52 - 21:38:04 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35060745.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5730.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5231.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 349426.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 147929.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1051550.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1656564.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 237928.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9935.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8013.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1201.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1253627.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35060745.3 3004.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5730.5 1041.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 5231.5 1216.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 349426.3 882.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 147929.5 893.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1051550.9 1813.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1656564.3 1331.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 237928.0 594.8 Process Creation 126.0 9935.4 788.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8013.0 1889.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1201.9 2003.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1253627.7 835.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1219.0
china800.net 洛杉矶PR 测试IP:192.161.59.33 / 100mb / php探针 / wp演示
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 218.8.79.1 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 9 | 20 | 104 | 13 | | 218.8.79.1 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 19 | 33 | 132 | 19 | | 1.62.143.253 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 9 | 21 | 109 | 15 | | 221.212.9.185 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 28 | 42 | 131 | 36 | | 113.4.128.57 - 6 | 36 | 34 | 11 | 25 | 134 | 17 | | 113.4.128.201 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 12 | 25 | 115 | 34 | | 219.158.17.173 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 39 | 60 | 146 | 43 | | 219.158.96.50 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 68 | 87 | 175 | 87 | | 219.158.5.130 - 3 | 42 | 41 | 73 | 95 | 186 | 97 | | 219.158.97.58 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 85 | 99 | 192 | 96 | | 219.158.27.18 - 0 | 44 | 44 | 222 | 250 | 437 | 234 | | GigabitEthernet3-1-1.GW4.SJC7.ALTER.NET - 0 | 44 | 44 | 546 | 588 | 753 | 577 | | 0.so-6-2-0.XL4.SJC7.ALTER.NET - 0 | 44 | 44 | 527 | 575 | 757 | 564 | | 0.xe-11-1-0.BR3.SJC7.ALTER.NET - 0 | 44 | 44 | 538 | 586 | 756 | 573 | | 204.255.168.82 - 3 | 40 | 39 | 499 | 571 | 830 | 514 | | dbtransit.ge9-6.br02.lax05.pccwbtn.net - 0 | 44 | 44 | 261 | 304 | 434 | 299 | | 96.44.180.14.internal.quadranet.com - 0 | 44 | 44 | 284 | 323 | 430 | 326 | | 192.161.59.33.static.quadranet.com - 0 | 44 | 44 | 253 | 295 | 435 | 304 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - 来自全中国最杯具线路黑龙江联通的路由追踪结果
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 261毫秒
- 51
- 2
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 296毫秒
- 52
- 3
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 211毫秒
- 52
- 4
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 234毫秒
- 49
- 5
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 239毫秒
- 50
- 6
- 上海[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 241毫秒
- 51
- 7
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 181毫秒
- 49
- 8
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 158毫秒
- 52
- 9
- 深圳[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 168毫秒
- 50
- 10
- 江西[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 155毫秒
- 50
- 11
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 165毫秒
- 50
- 12
- 重庆[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 191毫秒
- 51
- 13
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 162毫秒
- 52
- 14
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 196毫秒
- 51
- 15
- 香港[电信]
- 192.161.59.33
- 166毫秒
- 55
- 16
- 上海[多线]
- 192.161.59.33
- 190毫秒
- 48
- 17
- 北京[多线]
- 192.161.59.33
- 225毫秒
- 47
- 18
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 192.161.59.33
- 233毫秒
- 50
- 19
- 厦门[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 198毫秒
- 53
- 20
- 宁波[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 209毫秒
- 46
- 21
- 北京[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 290毫秒
- 44
- 22
- 辽宁[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 271毫秒
- 54
- 23
- 江苏[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 239毫秒
- 54
- 24
- 上海[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 193毫秒
- 51
- 25
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 234毫秒
- 53
- 26
- 河南[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 269毫秒
- 53
- 27
- 深圳[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 212毫秒
- 52
- 28
- 天津[联通]
- 192.161.59.33
- 277毫秒
- 47
- 29
- 深圳[移动]
- 192.161.59.33
- 196毫秒
- 50
- 30
- 江苏[移动]
- 192.161.59.33
- 185毫秒
- 49
- 31
- 河北[移动]
- 192.161.59.33
- 229毫秒
- 50
- 32
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 192.161.59.33
- 209毫秒
- 49
- 33
- 上海[移动]
- 192.161.59.33
- 178毫秒
- 52
最快:江西[电信] 155 毫秒 ### 最慢:四川绵阳[电信] 296 毫秒
电信平均:201 毫秒 ### 联通平均:239 毫秒
电信平均:201 毫秒 ### 联通平均:239 毫秒