文章导航
LocVPS是一家国人IDC主机商,采用XenServer架构,数据中心在洛杉矶MC(国内速度优秀),优惠码:locvps30永久3折,购买x1024方案 ¥64元/月(购买链接)配置如下:
- 1024MB guaranteed memory
- 50GB storage
- 1000GB/month data transfer @ 1Gbps
- XenServer/IdcSystem
locvps.com性价比高,99元还可购买赠送DirectAdmin的VDS。洛杉矶MC的线路,速度和稳定也很不错。站长也是hostloc的老人kwx。
洛杉矶 MC 测试IP:198.74.101.1 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示
[root@MyVPS vpsmm]# free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1024 981 42 0 52 801 -/+ buffers/cache: 127 896 Swap: 255 0 255 [root@MyVPS vpsmm]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 9.3G 2.4G 6.5G 27% / /dev/xvda1 99M 36M 58M 39% /boot tmpfs 513M 0 513M 0% /dev/shm
[root@MyVPS vpsmm]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/xvdb: 21.4 GB, 21474836480 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk /dev/xvdb doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/xvda: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/xvda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/xvda2 14 1044 8281507+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/xvda3 1045 1305 2096482+ 8e Linux LVM
[root@MyVPS vpsmm]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz stepping : 7 cpu MHz : 1800.000 cache size : 10240 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 4508.08 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz stepping : 7 cpu MHz : 1800.000 cache size : 10240 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 4508.08
[root@MyVPS vpsmm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync S4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9.05751 seconds, 29.6 MB/s [root@MyVPS vpsmm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8.18417 seconds, 32.8 MB/s [root@MyVPS vpsmm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.63335 seconds, 35.2 MB/s
[root@MyVPS vpsmm]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2012-10-11 12:07:31-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[============================================================>] 104,857,600 82.6M/s in 1.2s 2012-10-11 12:07:32 (82.6 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: MyVPS: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 23:41:32 EDT 2012 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz (4508.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz (4508.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext 10:24:17 up 17:34, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.03, 0.08; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 11 2012 10:24:17 - 10:52:14 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9326443.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1562.6 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1424.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 269314.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74088.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 728213.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 150271.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 43289.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2694.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2794.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 599.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 327751.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9326443.2 799.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1562.6 284.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 1424.6 331.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 269314.1 680.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74088.7 447.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 728213.2 1255.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 150271.9 120.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 43289.0 108.2 Process Creation 126.0 2694.4 213.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2794.3 659.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 599.8 999.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 327751.2 218.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 387.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 11 2012 10:52:14 - 11:20:14 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18180859.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3097.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2614.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 179056.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 22517.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 446904.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 267966.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 81490.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4957.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4411.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 643.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 604772.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18180859.4 1557.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3097.8 563.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 2614.2 608.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 179056.5 452.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 22517.8 136.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 446904.1 770.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 267966.2 215.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 81490.3 203.7 Process Creation 126.0 4957.6 393.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4411.9 1040.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 643.9 1073.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 604772.1 403.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 491.1
洛杉矶 MC 测试IP:198.74.101.1 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 113.0.148.1 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 19 | 44 | 44 | | 113.0.148.1 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 17 | 45 | 45 | | 221.212.8.241 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 39 | 57 | 57 | | 221.212.8.185 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 22 | 48 | 85 | 85 | | 113.4.128.53 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 24 | 37 | 56 | 56 | | 113.4.128.189 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 47 | 52 | 59 | 59 | | 219.158.7.65 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 43 | 48 | 58 | 58 | | 219.158.3.166 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 60 | 79 | 123 | 123 | | 219.158.97.242 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 54 | 77 | 123 | 123 | | 219.158.27.74 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 204 | 211 | 220 | 220 | | 219.158.33.202 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 208 | 227 | 268 | 268 | | ge-3-0-0.lax22.ip4.tinet.net - 0 | 5 | 5 | 223 | 234 | 250 | 237 | | ace-data-centers-gw.ip4.tinet.net - 0 | 5 | 5 | 240 | 249 | 260 | 260 | | tge8-2.cr2.lax.multacom.com - 0 | 5 | 5 | 233 | 244 | 252 | 242 | | tge53-13.cr5.lax.multacom.com - 0 | 5 | 5 | 232 | 237 | 250 | 233 | | tge8-4.core5.multacom.com - 0 | 5 | 5 | 238 | 246 | 255 | 238 | | 228-101-74-198-dedicated.multacom.com - 0 | 6 | 6 | 226 | 247 | 289 | 289 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - 来自全中国最杯具线路黑龙江联通的路由追踪结果
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 香港[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 168毫秒
- 55
- 2
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 220毫秒
- 51
- 3
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 197毫秒
- 52
- 4
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 141毫秒
- 49
- 5
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 156毫秒
- 49
- 6
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 194毫秒
- 52
- 7
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 148毫秒
- 50
- 8
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 195毫秒
- 50
- 9
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 214毫秒
- 52
- 10
- 上海[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 136毫秒
- 51
- 11
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 141毫秒
- 51
- 12
- 深圳[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 169毫秒
- 50
- 13
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 198.74.101.228
- 144毫秒
- 51
- 14
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 198.74.101.228
- 256毫秒
- 51
- 15
- 上海[多线]
- 198.74.101.228
- 143毫秒
- 47
- 16
- 上海[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 282毫秒
- 50
- 17
- 宁波[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 205毫秒
- 49
- 18
- 山东莱芜[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 268毫秒
- 45
- 19
- 天津[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 186毫秒
- 45
- 20
- 深圳[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 242毫秒
- 44
- 21
- 辽宁[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 297毫秒
- 47
- 22
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 289毫秒
- 50
- 23
- 北京[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 206毫秒
- 44
- 24
- 黑龙江牡丹江[联通]
- 198.74.101.228
- 220毫秒
- 50
- 25
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 198.74.101.228
- 198毫秒
- 47
- 26
- 河北[移动]
- 198.74.101.228
- 223毫秒
- 48
- 27
- 上海[移动]
- 198.74.101.228
- 186毫秒
- 51
- 28
- 深圳[移动]
- 198.74.101.228
- 197毫秒
- 48
最快:上海[电信] 136 毫秒 ### 最慢:辽宁[联通] 297 毫秒
电信平均:171 毫秒 ### 联通平均:243 毫秒
电信平均:171 毫秒 ### 联通平均:243 毫秒