文章导航
傲游主机是国人优秀VPS主机商，采用Xen架构，数据中心在洛杉矶MC（速度优秀），采用SSD硬盘，优惠码：vpsmm永久5折，购买x256方案 ￥28元/月（购买链接）配置如下：
- 256MB guaranteed memory
- 10GB storage
- 200GB/month data transfer on 1000Mbps
- Xen/IdcSystem
傲游主机是澳大利亚工商局备案注册公司，上线的SSD存储性能，远超普通HDD硬盘，特别适合对I/O 需求较大的客户，数据库读写频繁的程序或即时读写应用程序的理想选择。
此次优惠码：vpsmm，永久5折，全场通用。洛杉矶大硬盘、UBI、圣何塞等，均可使用。
aoyohost.com 洛杉矶 SSD 测试IP：198.74.98.227 / 100mb / php探针 / wp演示
[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.026 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8755.38 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.026 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8755.38 processor : 2 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.026 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8755.38 processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3500.026 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 8755.38
[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1024 956 68 0 63 741
-/+ buffers/cache: 150 873
Swap: 255 0 255
[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
9.3G 2.4G 6.5G 28% /
/dev/xvda1 99M 36M 58M 39% /boot
tmpfs 513M 0 513M 0% /dev/shm[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/xvdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk /dev/xvdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/xvda: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/xvda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/xvda2 14 1044 8281507+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/xvda3 1045 1305 2096482+ 8e Linux LVM[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 19.7693 seconds, 109 MB/s [root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 19.0379 seconds, 113 MB/s [root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 18.8539 seconds, 114 MB/s
[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda /dev/xvda: Timing buffered disk reads: 1006 MB in 3.01 seconds = 334.31 MB/sec [root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda /dev/xvda: Timing buffered disk reads: 1008 MB in 3.01 seconds = 335.38 MB/sec
[root@MyVPS lnmp0.9]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2012-09-25 12:24:56-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[=========================================>] 104,857,600 9.25M/s in 11s 2012-09-25 12:25:07 (9.09 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 25 2012 12:25:35 - 12:53:44
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19550985.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3071.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2298.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 579797.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 148060.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1533701.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 716706.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 121086.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6085.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6334.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1707.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 622328.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19550985.2 1675.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3071.6 558.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 2298.1 534.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 579797.5 1464.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 148060.5 894.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1533701.5 2644.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 716706.1 576.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 121086.7 302.7
Process Creation 126.0 6085.1 482.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6334.7 1494.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1707.6 2846.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 622328.1 414.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 893.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 25 2012 12:53:44 - 13:21:59
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 62112836.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11635.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11020.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 358073.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 92928.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1260954.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2883194.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 520897.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21481.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16121.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2633.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2287550.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 62112836.4 5322.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11635.7 2115.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 11020.9 2563.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 358073.4 904.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 92928.0 561.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1260954.9 2174.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2883194.4 2317.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 520897.8 1302.2
Process Creation 126.0 21481.2 1704.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16121.9 3802.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2633.7 4389.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2287550.7 1525.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2003.1aoyohost.com 洛杉矶 SSD 测试IP：198.74.98.227 / 100mb / php探针 / wp演示
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 113.1.225.1 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 9 | 10 | 25 | 9 | | 113.1.225.1 - 2 | 50 | 49 | 8 | 11 | 26 | 8 | | 221.206.0.109 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 11 | 14 | 49 | 11 | | 60.14.244.41 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 16 | 17 | 37 | 16 | | 219.158.6.113 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 39 | 44 | 85 | 40 | | 219.158.97.198 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 38 | 40 | 59 | 38 | | 219.158.97.166 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 39 | 41 | 58 | 40 | | 219.158.27.74 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 182 | 186 | 207 | 187 | | 219.158.33.202 - 0 | 54 | 54 | 213 | 217 | 247 | 218 | | ge-3-0-0.lax22.ip4.tinet.net - 0 | 54 | 54 | 217 | 227 | 254 | 225 | | ace-data-centers-gw.ip4.tinet.net - 0 | 54 | 54 | 215 | 224 | 361 | 226 | | tge8-2.cr2.lax.multacom.com - 0 | 54 | 54 | 216 | 239 | 598 | 256 | | tge53-13.cr5.lax.multacom.com - 0 | 54 | 54 | 215 | 223 | 251 | 227 | | tge8-4.core5.multacom.com - 0 | 54 | 54 | 228 | 235 | 255 | 242 | | 227-98-74-198-dedicated.multacom.com - 0 | 54 | 54 | 204 | 213 | 236 | 208 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - 来自全中国最杯具线路黑龙江联通的路由追踪结果
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 湖南衡阳[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 169毫秒
- 52
- 2
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 168毫秒
- 49
- 3
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 192毫秒
- 50
- 4
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 282毫秒
- 49
- 5
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 195毫秒
- 51
- 6
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 232毫秒
- 52
- 7
- 上海[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 127毫秒
- 51
- 8
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 252毫秒
- 52
- 9
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 195毫秒
- 52
- 10
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 142毫秒
- 50
- 11
- 深圳[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 157毫秒
- 50
- 13
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 156毫秒
- 52
- 14
- 香港[电信]
- 198.74.98.227
- 167毫秒
- 55
- 15
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 198.74.98.227
- 超时
- --
- 16
- 上海[多线]
- 198.74.98.227
- 215毫秒
- 48
- 17
- 上海[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 264毫秒
- 50
- 18
- 辽宁[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 275毫秒
- 52
- 19
- 深圳[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 362毫秒
- 46
- 20
- 宁波[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 209毫秒
- 49
- 21
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 275毫秒
- 50
- 22
- 山东莱芜[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 261毫秒
- 50
- 23
- 北京[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 177毫秒
- 45
- 24
- 黑龙江牡丹江[联通]
- 198.74.98.227
- 213毫秒
- 50
- 25
- 河北[移动]
- 198.74.98.227
- 215毫秒
- 47
- 26
- 深圳[移动]
- 198.74.98.227
- 208毫秒
- 48
- 27
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 198.74.98.227
- 225毫秒
- 49
- 28
- 上海[移动]
- 198.74.98.227
- 191毫秒
- 51
最快：上海[电信] 127 毫秒 ### 最慢：深圳[联通] 362 毫秒
电信平均：187 毫秒 ### 联通平均：254 毫秒
电信平均：187 毫秒 ### 联通平均：254 毫秒
