文章导航
格纳库是国人VPS主机商，采用OpenVZ架构，数据中心在圣何塞T2（国内速度优秀），六一优惠码：vpsmm永久4折，购买VZ128方案 ￥15.60元/月（购买链接）配置如下：
- 128MB guaranteed and 128MB vSwap memory
- 5GB storage
- 120GB/month data transfer @ 50Mbps
- OpenVZ/SolusVM
测试IP：74.82.169.131 / 100mb / php探针 / info探针
root@vpswiki:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.17759 s, 43.5 MB/s root@vpswiki:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.53804 s, 48.5 MB/s
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 501 481 20 0 174 230
-/+ buffers/cache: 76 425
Swap: 980 1 979 # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: ip-131: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab053.5 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 27 11:42:17 MSD 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L3426 @ 1.87GHz (3733.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L3426 @ 1.87GHz (3732.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L3426 @ 1.87GHz (3732.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L3426 @ 1.87GHz (3732.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext
23:27:24 up 9 days, 2:21, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue May 01 2012 23:27:24 - 23:56:08
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13577098.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2810.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1779.5 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 867952.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 228063.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1935309.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1656743.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 38148.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4573.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2984.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1397.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1898518.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13577098.2 1163.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2810.6 511.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1779.5 413.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 867952.3 2191.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 228063.3 1378.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1935309.3 3336.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1656743.7 1331.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 38148.6 95.4
Process Creation 126.0 4573.1 362.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2984.6 703.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1397.2 2328.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1898518.1 1265.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 887.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue May 01 2012 23:56:08 - 00:24:37
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29669847.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7398.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7741.1 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 651761.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 176881.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1991312.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3680833.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 124103.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19086.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11200.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1392.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4108813.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29669847.7 2542.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7398.8 1345.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 7741.1 1800.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 651761.6 1645.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 176881.9 1068.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1991312.2 3433.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3680833.1 2958.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 124103.3 310.3
Process Creation 126.0 19086.6 1514.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11200.3 2641.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1392.9 2321.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4108813.0 2739.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1757.5
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 221.212.0.24 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 30 | 75 | 11 |
| 221.212.0.24 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 43 | 201 | 16 |
| 221.212.9.237 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 33 | 76 | 14 |
| 221.212.9.185 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 42 | 194 | 11 |
| 221.212.1.149 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 43 | 185 | 13 |
| 113.4.128.129 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 35 | 67 | 198 | 39 |
| 219.158.7.49 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 31 | 66 | 205 | 33 |
| 219.158.23.14 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 75 | 114 | 230 | 79 |
| 219.158.11.146 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 66 | 99 | 217 | 70 |
| 219.158.96.210 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 78 | 118 | 231 | 81 |
| 12.118.130.85 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 241 | 275 | 361 | 241 |
| cr83.la2ca.ip.att.net - 0 | 11 | 11 | 250 | 279 | 385 | 252 |
| cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net - 0 | 11 | 11 | 243 | 274 | 379 | 248 |
| la2ca03jt.ip.att.net - 0 | 11 | 11 | 240 | 276 | 375 | 242 |
| 192.205.37.158 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 232 | 274 | 373 | 354 |
|te0-0-0-2.ccr22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com - 0 | 11 | 11 | 256 | 287 | 387 | 257 |
| te7-3.ccr02.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com - 0 | 11 | 11 | 269 | 315 | 398 | 347 |
| te2-1.ccr01.sjc07.atlas.cogentco.com - 0 | 11 | 11 | 265 | 301 | 383 | 266 |
| 38.99.107.162 - 0 | 11 | 11 | 268 | 303 | 385 | 269 |
| No response from host - 100 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 173-252-195-6.take2hosting.com - 0 | 11 | 11 | 270 | 313 | 378 | 272 |
| 74-82-169-131.take2hosting.com - 15 | 7 | 6 | 267 | 270 | 279 | 271 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - 来自黑龙江联通的路由追踪结果- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 211毫秒
- 51
- 2
- 江西吉安[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 292毫秒
- 50
- 3
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 195毫秒
- 51
- 4
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 175毫秒
- 50
- 5
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 273毫秒
- 49
- 6
- 山东青岛[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 172毫秒
- 47
- 7
- 深圳[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 191毫秒
- 49
- 8
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 176毫秒
- 49
- 9
- 香港[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 183毫秒
- 53
- 10
- 天津[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 292毫秒
- 49
- 11
- 厦门[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 210毫秒
- 51
- 12
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 144毫秒
- 50
- 13
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 200毫秒
- 49
- 14
- 上海[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 137毫秒
- 50
- 15
- 河北廊坊[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 274毫秒
- 47
- 16
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 74.82.169.131
- 306毫秒
- 49
- 17
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 74.82.169.131
- 235毫秒
- 48
- 18
- 香港[多线]
- 74.82.169.131
- 173毫秒
- 51
- 19
- 河南新乡[多线]
- 74.82.169.131
- 234毫秒
- 48
- 20
- 辽宁[联通]
- 74.82.169.131
- 237毫秒
- 52
- 21
- 河南新乡[联通]
- 74.82.169.131
- 237毫秒
- 49
- 22
- 深圳[联通]
- 74.82.169.131
- 271毫秒
- 50
- 23
- 上海[联通]
- 74.82.169.131
- 203毫秒
- 51
- 24
- 深圳[移动]
- 74.82.169.131
- 233毫秒
- 44
- 25
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 74.82.169.131
- 223毫秒
- 43
最快：上海[电信] 137 毫秒 ### 最慢：陕西西安[电信] 306 毫秒
电信平均：214 毫秒 ### 联通平均：237 毫秒
电信平均：214 毫秒 ### 联通平均：237 毫秒
