文章导航
80VPS是一家国人VPS服务商,采用Xen架构支持win2003系统,新增佛利蒙HE数据中心,终生8折码:he201202购买384方案仅 ¥48元/月(购买链接)配置如下:
- 384MB guaranteed and 256MB swap memory
- 20GB storage
- 250GB/month data transfer on 5Mbps
- Xen/Xensystem
##佛利蒙HE 测试IP:184.105.139.222 - 100mb.test - php探针 - info探针
还经营香港、圣何塞T2、洛杉矶等数据中心VPS,以下是小夜真实评测数据:
cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 30 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz stepping : 5 cpu MHz : 2533.332 cache size : 8192 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8] bogomips : 6334.92
free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 512 368 143 0 11 272 -/+ buffers/cache: 84 427 Swap: 255 0 255
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.18974 seconds, 51.7 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.44827 seconds, 60.3 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.30189 seconds, 62.4 MB/s
wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2012-02-12 16:41:17-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[===================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s in 9.0s 2012-02-12 16:41:26 (11.1 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: MyVPS: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 20:27:35 EDT 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (6334.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (6334.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext 16:53:33 up 22:57, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.27, 0.58; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 12 2012 16:53:33 - 17:21:24 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 11044752.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2278.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2041.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 446457.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120114.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1270075.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 663796.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 98721.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4141.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3952.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 855.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 477619.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 11044752.3 946.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2278.4 414.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2041.6 474.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 446457.4 1127.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 120114.0 725.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1270075.7 2189.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 663796.8 533.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 98721.6 246.8 Process Creation 126.0 4141.4 328.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3952.8 932.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 855.5 1425.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 477619.8 318.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 653.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 12 2012 17:21:24 - 17:49:18 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21944578.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4531.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4101.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 222609.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 59730.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 772097.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1315752.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 214052.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7973.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6321.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 944.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 926893.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21944578.8 1880.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4531.7 823.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 4101.3 953.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 222609.9 562.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 59730.4 360.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 772097.3 1331.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1315752.4 1057.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 214052.1 535.1 Process Creation 126.0 7973.1 632.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6321.5 1490.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 944.6 1574.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 926893.8 617.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 877.1 ========================================================================
##佛利蒙HE 测试IP:184.105.139.222 - 100mb.test - php探针 - info探针
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 1
- 襄阳[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 382毫秒
- 52
- 2
- 南宁[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 284毫秒
- 50
- 3
- 厦门[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 287毫秒
- 51
- 4
- 山东[联通]
- 184.105.139.222
- 237毫秒
- 51
- 5
- 福州[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 276毫秒
- 52
- 6
- 宁波[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 252毫秒
- 51
- 7
- 合肥[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 339毫秒
- 50
- 8
- 乐山[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 379毫秒
- 51
- 9
- 丽水[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 297毫秒
- 49
- 10
- 商丘[联通]
- 184.105.139.222
- 200毫秒
- 50
- 11
- 安徽[移动]
- 184.105.139.222
- 196毫秒
- 46
- 12
- 绵阳[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 396毫秒
- 52
- 13
- 杭州[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 363毫秒
- 50
- 14
- 东莞[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 288毫秒
- 50
- 15
- 天津[联通]
- 184.105.139.222
- 220毫秒
- 51
- 16
- 郑州[联通]
- 184.105.139.222
- 217毫秒
- 49
- 17
- 昆明[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 206毫秒
- 52
- 18
- 上海[移动]
- 184.105.139.222
- 188毫秒
- 49
- 19
- 德阳[电信]
- 184.105.139.222
- 303毫秒
- 51
- 20
- 辽宁[联通]
- 184.105.139.222
- 208毫秒
- 51
- 21
- 福建[移动]
- 184.105.139.222
- 202毫秒
- 47
最快:上海[移动] 188 毫秒 ## 最慢:绵阳[电信] 396 毫秒
电信平均:313 毫秒 ## 联通平均:216 毫秒
电信平均:313 毫秒 ## 联通平均:216 毫秒